ACTIVITY PROFILE BETWEEN WINNERS AND LOSERS IN SILAT OLAHRAGA MALE CLASS C 60KG, SEA GAMES 2015.
FACULTY OF SPORT SCIENCE AND RECREATION
SRT605
STATISTICS IN SPORT AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
TITLE
ACTIVITY PROFILE
BETWEEN WINNERS AND LOSERS IN SILAT
OLAHRAGA MALE CLASS C
60 KG, SEA GAMES 2015
PREPARED BY
NUR ELLIZA BINTI
MOKHTAR
2016690684
PREPARED FOR
DR. MOHAMAD NIZAM BIN
MOHAMED SHAPIE
Abstract
The aim of this study is to focus on
punching, kicking, toppling and sweeping techniques used in Silat Olahraga
competition during the 28th SEA Games Singapore 2015. There was 4
matches in men’s Class C category that has been notated which are Men’s
Quarterfinals Class C 60kg (Vietnam vs Singapore), Men’s Quarterfinals Class C
60kg (Laos vs Philippines), Men’s Semi-final Class C 60kg (Vietnam vs
Laos), and Men’s Final Class C 60kg
(Vietnam vs Thailand). In Silat, it can be divided into two which are Silat
Seni and Silat Olahraga. For this study, Silat Olahraga is a main basic of
sparing in competition.
For the results, there has 3 tables
shown for each match. The first tables will shows all the fourteen techniques
used by pesilat during competition with the indicator of hit target, miss
opponent and hit elsewhere as a guideline to determine the accuracy of how
successful the techniques would be whether it is good or bad for both sides.
The second table shows the frequency table for the main technique which are
punching, kicking, toppling and sweeping. While the last table shows the mean
and standard deviation of the four techniques and the country. Athletes tried
to perform as good as possible to achieve the highest score and a better
performance. As an athlete who competed in the competition, the situation is
influenced by various factors such as physical, technical, tactical and
psychological (Latifah, Rusdiana, Ugelta, Budiman,
& Karmini, 2017).
This technique would be occurring
when two pesilat perform in a competition. Pesilat can perform their techniques
of sweeping by attacking an opponent’s leg which are on the ground to unstable
them and bring down to the ground or floor while topple can use hand or leg to
take down the opponent. However, the point will be collected according to the
opponent falling down to the ground. The notational analyses are used to record
the punch, kick, topple and sweep with indicator of hit target, miss opponent
and hit elsewhere.
Keywords:
Kicking, Martial Arts, Coaching, Performance Analysis
Introduction
Silat is a term used to describe the
martial arts forms practiced throughout the Malay Archipelago. Silat is a
collective word for native’s martial arts that originates from Indonesia. According
to Shapie, M. N. M. and Elias (2016) Olahraga means the ability for silat
exponents to perform their silat techniques in combat with striking and
defensive actions such as punching, kicking, throwing, catching, parrying
blocking and the other skill related to the silat techniques.
It is traditionally practiced in Southern Thailand,
Singapore, Vietnam, Brunei, Philippines and also Malaysia. Silat is a combative
art of Malay fighting arts. According to Aziz, Tan, and Teh (2002) pencak silat
is divide by two categories which are silat olahraga and silat seni (contact
and artistic).
Silat Seni is a combination of
self-defense and art. This is evident of the fact that the self-defense
routines are performed in a manner of beautiful hand movements. Every step is
performed for the intention of defense rather than aggression. Moreover, Silat
Seni has various special ways of helping an individual build up
self-confidence, instill a sense of responsibility, become an effective weapon
for self-defense and strengthening the inner spirit.
Silat Olahraga is the famous silat
sport in Malaysia. The high intensity of the fight requires silat exponents to
stay fit in silat match. It is important to understand that a proper martial
art training system can help exponent to win a silat match. Silat Olahraga has
various techniques in defeating an enemy with a stronger built. Moreover,
minimal body movement is required in order to preserve the strength of the
pesilat for more effective well-planned reaction or attack.
Thus,
in the art of Silat Olahraga, a practitioner is taught specific offensive and defense
technique for him/her to acquire accurate and effective responses on enemy’s
attack. It is also enables them to develop their fullest ability. The
uniqueness of Silat Olahraga is the rule. In the rule, there are exist of basic
commands, time for each match, target area to attack the opponent, and the
scoring point for each of the area that attacked.
Material and Method
The data will be analysed based on
the video matches Pencak Silat Tanding Men’s Quarterfinals Class C 60kg
(Vietnam vs Singapore), Men’s Quarterfinals Class C 60kg (Laos vs Philippines),
Men’s Semi-final Class C 60kg (Vietnam vs Laos), and Men’s Final Class C 60kg (Vietnam vs
Thailand). This analysis will be focus more on the specific skills which are
punching, kicking, toppling and sweeping. All of these techniques will be
categorized into three indicators which are hit target, miss opponent and hit
elsewhere. Besides that the video will
be repeated and play in slow motion to identify the action or skills made by
exponents to get the accurate analyses (Shapie, M. M., Oliver, O’Donoghue,
& Tong, 2013).
These are the listing of the fourteen motion categories that used in Pencak
Silat Tanding:
Motion Categories
- Block
o The blocking movements will start with the posture
position and the exponent standsstraight with the hands around his body or
close to his chest. Blocking can also use arms, elbows and legs with the aim to
block off or striking back at any attack (Anuar, 1992).
- Kick
o The kick is an attacking movement which is performed
with one leg or both legs simultaneously. It can be front kick, side kick or
even semi-circular side kick. Every kick should be at the front of the body,
from the chest to the centre or must be hit at the pad then only the score will
be given (Anuar, 1992).
- Punch
o The punch attack is done by a hand with a closed
fist hitting the target. In Silat, punching is often used to fight the
opponent. It can be a straight punch or uppercut to the exponent body.
Basically, many exponents use the straight punch because easy to get the chance
and collect the point (Anuar, 1992).
- Topple
o There are various ways of toppling down one’s
opponent. Exponents can push, shove the opponent’s back leg from the bag or from
the side, shove hit, kick, strike or punch to make the opponent lose his
balance. Every fall is considered valid as long as the pesilat exponent topples
his opponent down without wrestling or he is able to overpower the opponent
whom he has brought down (Anuar, 1992).
- Catch
o The catch is made by using the hand to obstruct the
opponent from carrying out an attack. The silat exponent is able to prevent
himself from being attacked by pointing the attack which he has caught to
another direction. A catch which twists or drags the opponent is forbidden.
Also, a catch which could break the part which is being held such as leg and
waist is also forbidden. These regulations exist to protect the silat exponents
(Anuar, 1992).
- Sweep
o Swiping is involves attacking an opponent’s leg
which are on the ground to unstable them and bring down to the ground or floor.
A fighter or exponent can perform this attacking movement for both right and
left leg. Hence, front sweep is made by swinging the leg to the front to push
the opponent’s front leg, while back sweep is carried out by swinging the leg
backward to hit the back leg (Anuar, 1992).
- Dodge
o Dodge is the techniques that carry out by Silat
exponent when they tried to avoid an attack. This technique does not require
exponent to touch the opponent. There are variety ways of carrying out
defensive movements such as dodging, retreat, evasion to the side, bending,
jumping and ducking (Anuar, 1992).
- Block and Punch
o The blocking technique is required to block hand or
leg attack from the opponent and followed by counter attack using hand to punch
the opponent especially punch to hit target (Shapie, Oliver, O’Donoghue, &
Tong, 2013).
- Block and Kick
o The blocking technique is required to block hand and
leg attack from the opponent and followed by the counter attack using the leg
to kick the opponent direct to the hit target (Shapie et al., 2013)
- Block and Sweep
o The blocking technique is required to block and hand
and leg attack from the opponent followed by the counter attack using the
sweeping technique to the opponent and to make sure that the opponent is
falling down to get a higher scores (Shapie et al., 2013)
- Fake Punch
o Fake punch used to confuse the opponent using the
hand to break the defensive posture (Shapie et al., 2013).
- Fake Kick
o Fake kick used to confuse the opponent using the leg
to break the defensive posture (Shapie et al., 2013)
- Self-Release
o Self-release is the technique used to unlock any catch
from opponent or fighter (Anuar, 1993).
- Others
o Is the basic commands. The referee will say ‘Mulai’
meaning ‘Begin’ to start the game and ‘Berhenti’ also known as ‘Stop’ to stop
the fight (Anuar, 1993).
Reliability of Observations
The author analysed all the activities and simultaneously classified each change of motion in a single match. Two observations were done separated by 48 hours. It requires experienced silat practitioners to analyse the data as the movement of both exponents is fast, needing close inspection. The classification of movement was subjective with work being classified according to the instruction given by the referee.
Statistical Analysis
The observation generated data will
be frequency counted. Mean and Standard Deviation (SD) for all the marker has
been computed to locate the measurable factors that separated between winning
and losing group. All the statistical data was conducted using (SPSS),
Statistical Package Social Science version 21.
Results
The result has been showed in the
table below. For the first table, it concludes all the result from the 14
motion categories that combine the winners and losers group. For the second
table, it shows the specific skills that exponents used such as blocking,
kicking, punching and also topple. For the last table, it shows the mean and
standard deviation for both groups. There are three outcomes that will be used
for the observation of the video matches which are hit target, miss opponent
and hit elsewhere.
The
first match is Men’s Quarterfinals Class C 60kg, Vietnam (Red) vs Singapore
(Blue).
Actions
|
Outcome
Indicators
|
|||||||
Vietnam
(Winner)
|
Singapore
(Loser)
|
|||||||
Hit
Target
|
Miss
Opponent
|
Hit
Elsewhere
|
Not
Available
|
Hit
Target
|
Miss
Opponent
|
Hit
Elsewhere
|
Not
Available
|
|
Block
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
||||
Kick
|
5
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
10
|
3
|
||
Punch
|
1
|
3
|
||||||
Topple
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
||||
Catch
|
2
|
1
|
5
|
1
|
||||
Sweep
|
5
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
||||
Dodge
|
2
|
1
|
||||||
Block
and Punch
|
||||||||
Block
and Kick
|
3
|
|||||||
Block
and Sweep
|
1
|
|||||||
Fake
Punch
|
||||||||
Fake
Kick
|
1
|
|||||||
Self-Release
|
3
|
1
|
||||||
Others
|
17
|
17
|
||||||
Total
|
24
|
8
|
1
|
17
|
19
|
19
|
3
|
17
|
Legends:
Others stand for ‘Mulai’ meaning ‘Begin’ to start the game and ‘Berhenti’ also
known as ‘Stop’ to stop the fight.
Frequency
Table:
Exponent
|
Punch
|
Kick
|
Topple
|
Sweep
|
Total
|
Vietnam (Winner)
|
1
|
9
|
2
|
6
|
18
|
Singapore (Loser)
|
3
|
17
|
4
|
4
|
28
|
The second match is Men’s Quarterfinals Class C
60kg, Laos (Red) vs Philippines (Blue).
Actions
|
Outcome Indicators
|
|||||||
Laos (Winner)
|
Philippines (Loser)
|
|||||||
Hit Target
|
Miss Opponent
|
Hit Elsewhere
|
Not Available
|
Hit Target
|
Miss Opponent
|
Hit Elsewhere
|
Not Available
|
|
Block
|
4
|
1
|
4
|
5
|
5
|
2
|
||
Kick
|
6
|
4
|
8
|
6
|
1
|
10
|
||
Punch
|
6
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
||
Topple
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
||
Catch
|
9
|
3
|
5
|
6
|
6
|
|||
Sweep
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
||||
Dodge
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
||||
Block
and Punch
|
||||||||
Block
and Kick
|
||||||||
Block
and Sweep
|
||||||||
Fake
Punch
|
2
|
1
|
||||||
Fake
Kick
|
1
|
1
|
||||||
Self-Release
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
|||||
Others
|
17
|
17
|
||||||
Total
|
50
|
14
|
17
|
17
|
35
|
20
|
25
|
17
|
Legends:
Others stand for ‘Mulai’ meaning ‘Begin’ to start the game and ‘Berhenti’ also
known as ‘Stop’ to stop the fight.
Frequency
Table:
Exponent
|
Punch
|
Kick
|
Topple
|
Sweep
|
Total
|
Laos (Winner)
|
9
|
18
|
6
|
4
|
37
|
Philippines (Loser)
|
6
|
17
|
4
|
2
|
29
|
The third
match is Men’s Semi-final Class C 60kg, Laos (Red) vs Vietnam (Blue).
Actions
|
Outcome Indicators
|
|||||||
Laos (Loser)
|
Vietnam (Winner)
|
|||||||
Hit Target
|
Miss Opponent
|
Hit Elsewhere
|
Not Available
|
Hit Target
|
Miss Opponent
|
Hit Elsewhere
|
Not Available
|
|
Block
|
1
|
|||||||
Kick
|
4
|
7
|
12
|
8
|
1
|
3
|
||
Punch
|
5
|
4
|
5
|
1
|
2
|
|||
Topple
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
||||
Catch
|
3
|
1
|
||||||
Sweep
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
|||
Dodge
|
||||||||
Block
and Punch
|
||||||||
Block
and Kick
|
1
|
|||||||
Block
and Sweep
|
||||||||
Fake
Punch
|
5
|
4
|
2
|
|||||
Fake
Kick
|
3
|
1
|
||||||
Self-Release
|
||||||||
Others
|
17
|
17
|
||||||
Total
|
40
|
17
|
13
|
17
|
40
|
8
|
5
|
17
|
Legends:
Others stand for ‘Mulai’ meaning ‘Begin’ to start the game and ‘Berhenti’ also
known as ‘Stop’ to stop the fight.
Frequency
Table:
Exponent
|
Punch
|
Kick
|
Topple
|
Sweep
|
Total
|
Laos (Loser)
|
9
|
21
|
4
|
3
|
37
|
Vietnam (Winner)
|
8
|
12
|
4
|
5
|
29
|
The last
match is Men’s Final Class C 60kg, Vietnam (Red) vs Thailand (Blue).
Actions
|
Outcome Indicators
|
|||||||
Vietnam (Loser)
|
Thailand (Winner)
|
|||||||
Hit Target
|
Miss Opponent
|
Hit Elsewhere
|
Not Available
|
Hit Target
|
Miss Opponent
|
Hit Elsewhere
|
Not Available
|
|
Block
|
||||||||
Kick
|
7
|
5
|
3
|
6
|
2
|
3
|
||
Punch
|
8
|
2
|
7
|
4
|
||||
Topple
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
|||||
Catch
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
|||||
Sweep
|
5
|
1
|
3
|
|||||
Dodge
|
||||||||
Block
and Punch
|
||||||||
Block
and Kick
|
||||||||
Block
and Sweep
|
||||||||
Fake
Punch
|
1
|
1
|
||||||
Fake
Kick
|
1
|
2
|
||||||
Self-Release
|
||||||||
Others
|
17
|
17
|
||||||
Total
|
33
|
14
|
6
|
17
|
31
|
5
|
10
|
17
|
Legends:
Others stand for ‘Mulai’ meaning ‘Begin’ to start the game and ‘Berhenti’ also
known as ‘Stop’ to stop the fight.
Frequency
Table:
Exponent
|
Punch
|
Kick
|
Topple
|
Sweep
|
Total
|
Vietnam (Loser)
|
10
|
15
|
3
|
6
|
34
|
Thailand (Winner)
|
11
|
11
|
3
|
3
|
28
|
Discussion
The past examination states that
silat competitor’s taught to be mastering in both kicking and punching yet
punching recurrence is lower than a kicking (M. M. Shapie et al., 2013).
However, silat competitors should create punching ability speedier and precise
in light of the fact that punching is the high rate effective of hitting target
contrast with kicking expertise in rivalry (M. M. Shapie et al., 2013).
According to the result of data shows that Vietnam has won two match from men’s
quarterfinals Class C 60kg and men’s semi-final Class C 60kg while men’s
quarterfinals Class C 60kg between Laos and Philippines has won by Laos. For
the last match is men’s final Class C 60kg between Vietnam and Thailand. The
match was directly won to Thailand because Vietnam has been disqualified.
Based on the researcher record from the video matches,
the total of frequency table for Vietnam is 18 and 37 and 34. This total are
comprises from variety technique such as block, kick, punch and topple. From
this result Vietnam is higher than the other exponents during the competition.
In this match, the fighter or exponents use both upper and lower body part to
make a movement and the fighter is really good in both at punching and kicking
than other techniques. Competitor must
wise to make strategy plan and technique during match (Wahab, 1989).
For this analysis, the fighter has
to developed more strength, power, agility and cardiovascular fitness to
enhance or maintain the performance level. Each physical fitness component is
important to them for developed or train during training and will perform well
during competition. Current study showed, the fighter mostly used kicking and
punching techniques than other that is because the fighter was good at both
techniques to get more score or point during competition. Usually, the winner
uses their tactic and knows how to make self-defense very well from being
attacked and always find the chance to attack the opponent such as topple down
which is the fighter use their leg or hand to let the opponent falling down to
the floor then after that the fighter will get the point (Shapie, M. N. M.
& Elias, 2015).
Refer to frequency table in the
first match between Vietnam (Red) and Singapore (Blue), the fighter from
Singapore got higher score from punching (3), kicking (17) and topple (4) but
the fighter from Vietnam got higher score in sweep (6). However, Vietnam won
the match might be because he gets a high score in sweeping. For the second
match, the fighter from Laos made 9 punch, 18 kick, 6 topple and 4 sweep. In
this match, the fighter uses more kick than punch. The third match has won by
Vietnam with 8 punch, 12 kick, 4 topple and 5 sweep. Although Laos has a higher
frequency score, but Laos has made a lot of miss opponent compared to Vietnam.
And for the last match, Vietnam has made 10 punch, 15 kick, 3 topple and 6
sweep.
Conclusion
The conclusion of this study is to
determine which level of method used by both exponents in Silat Olahraga Sea
Games 2015 has a higher score. For example, we use punch, kick, topple and
sweep as the main focus techniques with the indicator of hit target, miss
opponent and hit elsewhere. The exponents who make the best technique or use
more tactical, will get the higher score and win the competition. Besides, Pesilat
need to improve their fitness level such as muscular strength, cardiovascular
endurance, power, agility, speed to enhance their performance level. In this
study is to observe which techniques are used more during competition by both
fighters. The fewer mistakes they make, the better result they will get.
However, the exponents should
develop more their strength, power, agility to give the fast attack to the
opponent. Based on this observation, the winner used more kick and topples
technique to get the higher score than the other fighter. Both the exponents
used the high intensity action than low intensity action during the competition
because it also helps to contribute to get the highest score rather than low
intensity action. Last but not least, to ensure the good performance played by
the athletes of ‘Pesilat’, they have to fully prepare especially on their
physical & mental in order to give their best commitment and also good
results by winning each games.
It is good if those developing conditioning elements of training programs for Silat Olahraga athletes are aware of the frequency and spread of duration of action and rest periods within action periods. It is also recommended that future studies determine the full range of activities performed with movement classifications and the variation of strikes that contribute to losing and winning the match.
The implication from a coaching perspective of the types and frequencies of strikes used would suggest that in training, a large proportion of time needs to be utilized in development of kicking and blocking as well as the conditioning of lower limbs in order to absorbs strikes and resist fatigue during a match to being able to defend and counter attack effectively.
Lastly, it is recommended for pesilat either winner or loser to improve their motion skill to expertise. Coaches need to emphasize the skill related fitness of an athlete to enhance their performance. There is a limitation on this case study as the findings represent only 4 silat match, so the finding cannot be generalized to all silat competition. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to analyse the winner motion skill during a silat match.
Recommendations
It is good if those developing conditioning elements of training programs for Silat Olahraga athletes are aware of the frequency and spread of duration of action and rest periods within action periods. It is also recommended that future studies determine the full range of activities performed with movement classifications and the variation of strikes that contribute to losing and winning the match.
The implication from a coaching perspective of the types and frequencies of strikes used would suggest that in training, a large proportion of time needs to be utilized in development of kicking and blocking as well as the conditioning of lower limbs in order to absorbs strikes and resist fatigue during a match to being able to defend and counter attack effectively.
Lastly, it is recommended for pesilat either winner or loser to improve their motion skill to expertise. Coaches need to emphasize the skill related fitness of an athlete to enhance their performance. There is a limitation on this case study as the findings represent only 4 silat match, so the finding cannot be generalized to all silat competition. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to analyse the winner motion skill during a silat match.
References
Latifah, E., Rusdiana, A., Ugelta, S., Budiman, D.,
& Karmini, M. (2017). Contribution
of Intelligence and Emotional Qoutients with Performance Athletes Pencak Silat. Paper
presented at the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.
Shapie, M. M., Oliver, J., O’Donoghue, P., &
Tong, R. (2013). Activity profile during action time in national silat
competition. Journal of Combat
Sports and Martial Arts., 1(2), 81-86.
Shapie, M. N. M. (2011). Influence of Age and Maturation on Fitness Development, Trainability
And Competitive Performance In Youth Silat. Cardiff Metropolitan
University.
Shapie, M. N. M., & Elias, M. S. (2015). Seni Silat Malaysia: The Malay Arts of
Self-Defence. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 1st World
Congress on Health and Martial Arts in Interdisciplinary Approach, HMA 2015.
Shapie, M. N. M., & Elias, M. S. (2016). Silat:
The curriculum of Seni Silat Malaysia. Revista de Artes Marciales Asiáticas, 11(2s), 122-125.
Shapie, M. N. M., Zenal, Z., Parnabas, V., &
Abdullah, N. M. (2016). The Correlation between Leadership Coaching Style and
Satisfaction among University Silat Olahraga Athletes. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial
Arts Anthropology, 3(16), 34-39.
Sport Singapore. (2015). Pencak Silat Tanding Men’s Class C Quaterfinals
Vietnam vs Sin (Day 6); 28th SEA Games Singapore 2015. Retrieved at March 19,
2017 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SokrF52rGxg
Sport Singapore. (2015). Pencak Silat Tanding Men’s Class C
Quarterfinals Laos vs Philippines (Day 6); 28th SEA Games Singapore 2015.
Retrieved at March 19, 2017 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLTGxEEipCQ
Sport Singapore. (2015). Pencak Silat Tanding Men’s Class C Semi-finals
Vietnam vs Laos (Day 8); 28th SEA Games Singapore 2015. Retrieved at March 19,
2017 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3o4IIQLkMZA
Sport
Singapore. (2015). Pencak Silat Tanding Men’s Class C Finals Vietnam vs Thailand
(Day 9); 28th SEA Games Singapore 2015. Retrieved at March 19, 2017 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-mBeT3D87Y
Appendices
Men’s Quarterfinals Class C 60kg,
Vietnam (Red) vs Singapore (Blue).
Statistics
|
|||||
Punch
|
Kick
|
Topple
|
Sweep
|
||
N
|
Valid
|
4
|
26
|
6
|
10
|
Missing
|
22
|
0
|
20
|
16
|
|
Mean
|
1.75
|
1.65
|
1.67
|
1.40
|
|
Std. Error of Mean
|
.250
|
.095
|
.211
|
.163
|
|
Std.
Deviation
|
.500
|
.485
|
.516
|
.516
|
Statistics
|
|||
Vietnam
|
Singapore
|
||
N
|
Valid
|
18
|
26
|
Missing
|
8
|
0
|
|
Mean
|
2.72
|
2.42
|
|
Std.
Error of Mean
|
.240
|
.159
|
|
Std.
Deviation
|
1.018
|
.809
|
Reliability Statistics
|
||
Cronbach's Alpha
|
Cronbach's Alpha Based on Standardized Items
|
N of Items
|
.964
|
.964
|
2
|
Inter-Item Correlation
Matrix
|
||
Vietnam1
|
Vietnam2
|
|
Vietnam1
|
1.000
|
.931
|
Vietnam2
|
.931
|
1.000
|
Intraclass Correlation
Coefficient
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intraclass Correlation
|
95% Confidence Interval
|
F Test with True Value 0
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lower Bound
|
Upper Bound
|
Value
|
df1
|
df2
|
Sig
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Single
Measures
|
.922
|
.807
|
.970
|
24.569
|
17
|
18
|
.000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average
Measures
|
.959
|
.893
|
.985
|
24.569
|
17
|
18
|
.000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One-way
random effects model where people effects are random.
|
Men’s Quarterfinals Class C 60kg, Laos (Red) vs Philippines (Blue).
Statistics
|
|||||
Punch
|
Kick
|
Topple
|
Sweep
|
||
N
|
Valid
|
15
|
35
|
10
|
6
|
Missing
|
20
|
0
|
25
|
29
|
|
Mean
|
1.40
|
1.49
|
1.40
|
1.33
|
|
Std.
Error of Mean
|
.131
|
.086
|
.163
|
.211
|
|
Std.
Deviation
|
.507
|
.507
|
.516
|
.516
|
Statistics
|
|||
Laos
|
Philippines
|
||
N
|
Valid
|
37
|
29
|
Missing
|
0
|
8
|
|
Mean
|
2.14
|
2.07
|
|
Std.
Error of Mean
|
.151
|
.148
|
|
Std.
Deviation
|
.918
|
.799
|
Reliability Statistics
|
||
Cronbach's Alpha
|
Cronbach's Alpha Based on Standardized Items
|
N of Items
|
.947
|
.961
|
2
|
Inter-Item Correlation
Matrix
|
||
Laos1
|
Laos2
|
|
Laos1
|
1.000
|
.924
|
Laos2
|
.924
|
1.000
|
Intraclass Correlation
Coefficient
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intraclass Correlation
|
95% Confidence Interval
|
F Test with True Value 0
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lower Bound
|
Upper Bound
|
Value
|
df1
|
df2
|
Sig
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Single
Measures
|
.883
|
.780
|
.939
|
16.061
|
33
|
34
|
.000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average
Measures
|
.938
|
.876
|
.969
|
16.061
|
33
|
34
|
.000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One-way
random effects model where people effects are random.
|
Men’s Semi-final Class C 60kg, Vietnam (Blue) vs Laos (Red)
Statistics
|
|||||
Punch
|
Kick
|
Topple
|
Sweep
|
||
N
|
Valid
|
17
|
33
|
8
|
8
|
Missing
|
18
|
2
|
27
|
27
|
|
Mean
|
1.47
|
1.36
|
1.50
|
1.63
|
|
Std. Error of Mean
|
.125
|
.085
|
.189
|
.183
|
|
Std.
Deviation
|
.514
|
.489
|
.535
|
.518
|
Statistics
|
|||
Laos
|
Vietnam
|
||
N
|
Valid
|
37
|
29
|
Missing
|
0
|
8
|
|
Mean
|
2.03
|
2.21
|
|
Std.
Error of Mean
|
.137
|
.195
|
|
Std.
Deviation
|
.833
|
1.048
|
Reliability Statistics
|
||
Cronbach's Alpha
|
Cronbach's Alpha Based on Standardized Items
|
N of Items
|
1.000
|
1.000
|
2
|
Inter-Item Correlation Matrix
|
||
|
Laos1
|
Laos2
|
Laos1
|
1.000
|
1.000
|
Laos2
|
1.000
|
1.000
|
Intraclass Correlation
Coefficient
|
|||||||
|
Intraclass Correlation
|
95% Confidence Interval
|
F Test with True Value 0
|
||||
Lower Bound
|
Upper Bound
|
Value
|
df1
|
df2
|
Sig
|
||
Single
Measures
|
1.000
|
1.000
|
1.000
|
3702659153100067.500
|
36
|
37
|
.000
|
Average
Measures
|
1.000
|
1.000
|
1.000
|
3702659153100067.500
|
36
|
37
|
.000
|
One-way
random effects model where people effects are random.
|
Reliability Statistics
|
||
Cronbach's Alpha
|
Cronbach's Alpha Based on Standardized Items
|
N of Items
|
.992
|
.992
|
2
|
Inter-Item
Correlation Matrix
|
||
|
Vietnam1
|
Vietnam2
|
Vietnam1
|
1.000
|
.984
|
Vietnam2
|
.984
|
1.000
|
Intraclass Correlation
Coefficient
|
|||||||
|
Intraclass Correlation
|
95% Confidence Interval
|
F Test with True Value 0
|
||||
Lower Bound
|
Upper Bound
|
Value
|
df1
|
df2
|
Sig
|
||
Single
Measures
|
.984
|
.966
|
.992
|
123.429
|
28
|
29
|
.000
|
Average
Measures
|
.992
|
.983
|
.996
|
123.429
|
28
|
29
|
.000
|
One-way
random effects model where people effects are random.
|
Comments
Post a Comment